(Headline is misleading but a good arti
(Headline is misleading but a good article.)
Originally shared by Kevin BonhamYup.
"While some fringe OA publishers are playing a short con, subscription publishers are seasoned grifters playing a long con. They fleece the research community of billions of dollars every year by convincing them of something manifestly false – that their journals and their “peer review” process are an essential part of science, and that we need them to filter out the good science – and the good scientists – from the bad."
"While some fringe OA publishers are playing a short con, subscription publishers are seasoned grifters playing a long con. They fleece the research community of billions of dollars every year by convincing them of something manifestly false – that their journals and their “peer review” process are an essential part of science, and that we need them to filter out the good science – and the good scientists – from the bad."
I confess, I wrote the Arsenic DNA paper to expose flaws in peer-review at subscription based journals
Shared with: Public
+1'd by: Amit Benbassat
Reshared by: Amit Benbassat
This post was originally on Google+